10.31
What do the US, China, Mexico, and Venzuela have in common?
Income inequality.
And, some would say, a diminishing freedom of expression. What does this have to do with cultural entrepreneurship and the Arts?
A recent report conducted by the National Committee on Responsive Philanthropy shows that, of the $2.3 billion given to US arts and culture organizations, less than 2% is given to organizations with budgets under $5million. You might ask, “So what?” The report next points out that the vast majority of arts and culture organizations with budgets over $5million are predominantly white, urban, and support “high art”. In other words, the expressions of non-white, non-privileged, rural, emerging, controversial, or edgy artists is absent.
And still you ask, “So what?”
If the definition of art is: “art is made with the intention of stimulating thoughts and emotions”, do we really want 98% of the art we engage with to reflect the thoughts and emotions, experiences, hopes, dreams, and desperations of white, urban, wealthy Americans? Or, do we want our collective expression to reflect who we are as a nation: 36% non white, 12.4% foreign born, $50,221 median household income, 48 million living in rural communities…
Income inequality is creating inequality of cultural and artistic expression.







